![]() ![]() A user can go with the default policy, and there's no complicated issue that would arise from implementing Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. Just from the default policy, it's already good. I don't have a lot of advice for people looking into implementing the solution, because it's very easy to use. Currently, there are not many complaints from the users because Symantec can now better handle the maintenance and sort out problems about Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. ![]() You don't get much detail and it was very complicated. Years ago, the maintenance schedule you get from Symantec, from Broadcom, was very bad. ![]() Right now, it's very good, for example, last month had good maintenance compared to other months. I'm not doing any maintenance on the solution because it's cloud-based, so usually end-users open tickets directly with the support team or with technical consultants who are in charge of handling the issues. My company has a partnership with Symantec and is a distributor of Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |